You asked
How do I take my turn?
Answered counted as answeredAsked with: Secret Hitlerbg-188834-en-1e
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- corpus profile
- live
- answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
- gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
- timings
- search 280 ms · ask 6969 ms · total 7260 ms
- single-flight (PR-5)
- queued 0 ms · generation 7260 ms
- retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read
- [{"page": 4, "score": 0.032787, "snippet": "During the Legislative Session, the President and Chancellor work together to enact a new Policy in secret. The President draws the top three tiles from the Policy deck, looks at them in secret, and discards one tile face down into the Discard pile. The remaining two tiles go to the Chancellor, who ", "headingPath": "LEGISLATIVE SESSION", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.032258, "snippet": "Select the Fascist track that corresponds to the number of players and place it next to any Liberal track. Shuffle the 11 Fascist Policy tiles and the 6 Liberal Policy tiles into a single Policy deck and place that deck face down on the Draw pile card. You'll need an envelope for each player, and ea", "headingPath": "SET UP", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 6, "score": 0.031746, "snippet": "The Veto Power is a special rule that comes into effect after five Fascist Policies have been enacted. For all Legislative Sessions after the fifth Fascist Policy is enacted, the Executive branch gains a permanent new ability to discard all three Policy tiles if both the Chancellor and President agr", "headingPath": "VETO POWER", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "ABOUT LYING: Often, some players learn things that the rest of the players don't know, like when the President and Chancellor get to see Policy tiles, or when a President uses the Investigate power to see someone's Party Membership card. You can always lie about hidden knowledge in Secret Hitler. Th", "headingPath": "LEGISLATIVE SESSION · EXECUTIVE ACTION · Investigate Loyalty · Call Special Election", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 4, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "Term limits only affect nominations to the Chancellorship; anyone can be President, even someone who was just Chancellor. If there are only five players left in the game, only the last elected Chancellor is ineligible to be Chancellor Candidate; the last President may be nominated. There are some ot", "headingPath": "ON ELIGIBILITY: · 3. Vote on the government · If the vote is a tie, or if a majority of players votes no: · If a majority of players votes yes:", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "The President secretly looks at the top three tiles in the Policy deck and then returns them to the top of the deck without changing the order. The President executes one player at the table by saying 'I formally execute [player name].' If that player is Hitler, the game ends in a Liberal victory. I", "headingPath": "Policy Peek · Execution", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.029851, "snippet": "Secret Hitler features an investigation mechanic that allows some players to find out what team other players are on, and this mechanic only works if Hitler's special role is not revealed. To prevent that from happening, every player has both a Secret Role card and a Party Membership card. Hitler's ", "headingPath": "WHY ARE THERE SECRET ROLE AND PARTY MEMBERSHIP CARDS? · GAMEPLAY · 1. Pass the Presidential Candidacy · 2. Nominate a Chancellor · Eligibility: · ON ELIGIBILITY:", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 6, "score": 0.029412, "snippet": "Everyone should claim to be a Liberal. Since the Liberal team has a voting majority, it can easily shut out any player claiming to be a Fascist. As a Fascist, there is no advantage to outing yourself to the majority. Additionally, Liberals should usually tell the truth. Liberals are trying to figure", "headingPath": "STRATEGY NOTES · THANK YOU", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}]
- citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show
- [{"page": 3, "quote": null, "headingPath": "WHY ARE THERE SECRET ROLE AND PARTY MEMBERSHIP CARDS? · GAMEPLAY · 1. Pass the Presidential Candidacy · 2. Nominate a Chancellor · Eligibility: · ON ELIGIBILITY:", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 4, "quote": null, "headingPath": "ON ELIGIBILITY: · 3. Vote on the government · If the vote is a tie, or if a majority of players votes no: · If a majority of players votes yes:", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 4, "quote": null, "headingPath": "LEGISLATIVE SESSION", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 5, "quote": null, "headingPath": "LEGISLATIVE SESSION · EXECUTIVE ACTION · Investigate Loyalty · Call Special Election", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}, {"page": 5, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Policy Peek · Execution", "sharpsignalDocId": 126}]
- boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
-
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 126 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 126 boosted
- answered-before recall
-
this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
- debug row retained until
- Nov 6, 2026 14:39
retrieval — what the passage search returned
what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. How much wider that pool was is set gateway-side and is NOT REPORTED for this ruling, and neither are the answerer's final rows — so rulesage has nothing of its own to show beside these.
score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.
per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| fused rank | document | heading | page | fused RRF score | snippet chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | LEGISLATIVE SESSION | p.4 | 0.032787 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | SET UP | p.2 | 0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | VETO POWER | p.6 | 0.031746 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | LEGISLATIVE SESSION · EXECUTIVE ACTION · Investigate Loyalty · Call Special Election | p.5 | 0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | ON ELIGIBILITY: · 3. Vote on the government · If the vote is a tie, or if a majority of players votes no: · If a majority of players votes yes: | p.4 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | Policy Peek · Execution | p.5 | 0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | WHY ARE THERE SECRET ROLE AND PARTY MEMBERSHIP CARDS? · GAMEPLAY · 1. Pass the Presidential Candidacy · 2. Nominate a Chancellor · Eligibility: · ON ELIGIBILITY: | p.3 | 0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | STRATEGY NOTES · THANK YOU | p.6 | 0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it
what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.
the passages the answerer read: NOT RECORDED for this ruling. Any of three things leaves this empty, and they are all different from the answerer having had nothing to read: this ask may never have reached a gateway at all; a multi-book ask keeps each book's own context on that book's own page rather than here; or the gateway build that answered may simply not report it. What this NEVER means is that the answerer read nothing — an answer was composed from passages either way, and their absence here is a gap in what we were told, not in what it read.
chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| # | document | heading | page | quote chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | WHY ARE THERE SECRET ROLE AND PARTY MEMBERSHIP CARDS? · GAMEPLAY · 1. Pass the Presidential Candidacy · 2. Nominate a Chancellor · Eligibility: · ON ELIGIBILITY: | p.3 | no quote on the wire |
| [2] | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | ON ELIGIBILITY: · 3. Vote on the government · If the vote is a tie, or if a majority of players votes no: · If a majority of players votes yes: | p.4 | no quote on the wire |
| [3] | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | LEGISLATIVE SESSION | p.4 | no quote on the wire |
| [4] | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | LEGISLATIVE SESSION · EXECUTIVE ACTION · Investigate Loyalty · Call Special Election | p.5 | no quote on the wire |
| [5] | RULEBOOK Secret Hitler — Rulebook (corpus doc 126) | Policy Peek · Execution | p.5 | no quote on the wire |
generation — timing and the path taken
- timing split
- retrieval 280 ms · first delta 3339 ms · total 7260 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
- full breakdown
- queued 0 ms · retrieval 280 ms · ask 6969 ms · gateway work 7260 ms · total 7260 ms
- tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
- 2909
- tokens out (what the answerer generated)
- 527
- tok/sec
- 136.2 tok/sec — 527 output tokens in 3.869 s of generation
- live seat (read from the running child)
- answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 37s ago)
- stream path
- streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
- watchdog
- first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
- num_ctx · think posture
- both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
disposition
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered)
- answered — no abstain rationale applies
setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render
- decision
- NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question
errata registry — what the gate above had to match against
this game registers NO errata cards (edition 48), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one
Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.