Ruling — Lost Ruins of Arnak

You asked

how do i win?

Answered counted as answered

Asked with: Lost Ruins of Arnakbg-312484-en-1e

Whoever has the most points wins.[1] In a solo campaign, whoever has more points than their rival wins.[2]

Points are calculated at the end of the game by recording and adding up everyone's points from the following sources:[1]

* Research tokens (based on its row) [1]

* Magnifying glasses in the Lost Temple row (based on the order they reached the Lost Temple) [1]

* Temple tiles (the amount shown on the tile) [1]

* Idols (3 points each, even if in a slot) [1]

* Empty idol slots (the points shown in them) [1]

* Overcome guardians (5 points each) [1]

* Item and artifact cards (the amount shown in the lower right corner) [1]

Points are subtracted for:

* Fear cards (-1 point each) [1]

* Fear tiles (-2 points each) [1]

Ties are broken using these priorities:[1]

1. The player who reached the Lost Temple first.[1]

2. If no one reached the Lost Temple, the player with the highest research score.[1]

3. If players are still tied after these steps, they remain tied.[1]

[1] RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook · p.18 · Final Scoring · Whoever has the most points wins.

[2] RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook · p.21 · Buy an Artifact · End of Round · Scoring · Solo Campaign The Search for Professor Kutil

🔧 debug — where this ruling came from

outcome: ANSWERED — Answered
corpus profile: live,vps
answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only): gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
timings: search 81 ms · ask 4667 ms · total 4749 ms
single-flight (PR-5): queued 0 ms · generation 4749 ms
retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read: [{"page": 18, "score": 0.04918, "snippet": "Day 18 - I feel like this island sti holds many secrets, but the time has come to return home and share our findings. At the end of the game, record everyone's points on the scoring sheet and add them up. Points can come from the following sources: Each of your research tokens scores points based o", "headingPath": "Final Scoring · Whoever has the most points wins.", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 21, "score": 0.047875, "snippet": "As you may have guessed, this is just like buying an item. At the end of the round, return all rival archaeologists to their board. Your rival does not gain Fear cards . Shuffle the action stack face down, and your rival is ready to go again. Your rival will be the starting player in every round, so", "headingPath": "Buy an Artifact · End of Round · Scoring · Solo Campaign The Search for Professor Kutil", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 21, "score": 0.032258, "snippet": "Your rival discovers a or site, depending on the round. If there are multiple undiscovered sites: ◊ First narrow the choices down to one row. Among sites, give preference to the bottom row. ◊ Then use the decision arrow to choose left or right. Put a rival archaeologist on the chosen space. Move the", "headingPath": "Discover a New Site · Research · Overcome a Guardian · Buy an Item", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 8, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "Day 8 - Though our eagerness to begin is mixed with a certain amount of trepidation, now is not the time to let our courage fail. If there are dangers, we, we came here to confront them. To the jungle then, and no delay! On your turn, you have several options. Your choices will depend on the cards ", "headingPath": "Your Turn · Main Actions · Your Hand · TRAVEL VALUE · EFFECT · FREE ACTIONS · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 17, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "On your turn, you can choose to pass - inform the other players that you will take no more turns this round. Passing counts as your main action for the turn. At this time, you should also use up any free actions you still have available. If you take no other main action, then you must pass. It is no", "headingPath": "We have discovered such wonders today! Who knows what we sha find tomorrow? · Setup for Next Round · All players simultaneously do the following: · The card row should be adjusted as follows: · End of Round V", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 11, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "Day 11 - We fought the monstrous creature hand to hand, knife to claw! The beast went down! But none could strike the death blow. We stood in awe. The beast bowed its head, acknowledging us. And we realized, then, that this was no monster. No, this creature was one of Arnak's legendary guardians. My", "headingPath": "Overcome a Guardian · Guardians · To Overcome a Guardian · Using a Guardian's Boon · Idols", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 20, "score": 0.029851, "snippet": "Your rival wants to keep you from getting the depicted resource. Look for a site offering that resource and put a rival archaeologist on the space there. (If all such spaces are occupied, your rival does nothing.) If there are multiple such spaces, your rival chooses one with the following prioritie", "headingPath": "Dig at a Site · THE DECISION ARROW", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 11, "score": 0.029412, "snippet": "The four slots at the top of your board give you access to useful effects. On your turn, you may put an idol in a slot as a free action : Move the idol from your supply crates to the leftmost unoccupied slot on your player board. Choose one effect from the five depicted options. Some boons are trave", "headingPath": "IDOL SLOTS", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}]
citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show: [{"page": 18, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Final Scoring · Whoever has the most points wins.", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}, {"page": 21, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Buy an Artifact · End of Round · Scoring · Solo Campaign The Search for Professor Kutil", "sharpsignalDocId": 212}]
boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3): no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 212 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 212 boosted
answered-before recall: this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
answer fence: passed — letter density 0.87453 of 797 non-space chars (floor 0.45); 0 glyph-index tokens (max 2)
debug row retained until: Nov 12, 2026 06:59

retrieval — what the passage search returned

what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.

score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.

per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

fused rank	document	heading	page	fused RRF score	snippet chars
#1	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Final Scoring · Whoever has the most points wins.	p.18	0.04918 (at the 3-arm ceiling (0.04918) — every arm ranked it #1)	300
#2	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Buy an Artifact · End of Round · Scoring · Solo Campaign The Search for Professor Kutil	p.21	0.047875 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#3	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Discover a New Site · Research · Overcome a Guardian · Buy an Item	p.21	0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#4	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Your Turn · Main Actions · Your Hand · TRAVEL VALUE · EFFECT · FREE ACTIONS · …	p.8	0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#5	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	We have discovered such wonders today! Who knows what we sha find tomorrow? · Setup for Next Round · All players simultaneously do the following: · The card row should be adjusted as follows: · End of Round V	p.17	0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#6	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Overcome a Guardian · Guardians · To Overcome a Guardian · Using a Guardian's Boon · Idols	p.11	0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#7	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Dig at a Site · THE DECISION ARROW	p.20	0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#8	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	IDOL SLOTS	p.11	0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300

what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it

what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.

candidate pool: the answering read scored 39 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.

floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.

arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.

read at	document	heading	page	fused rank	fused RRF score	carried by	how it got its slot
#1	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Final Scoring · Whoever has the most points wins.	p.18	#1	0.04918 (at the 3-arm ceiling (0.04918) — every arm ranked it #1)	vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it
#2	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Discover a New Site · Research · Overcome a Guardian · Buy an Item	p.21	#3	0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	vector + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it
#3	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	We have discovered such wonders today! Who knows what we sha find tomorrow? · Setup for Next Round · All players simultaneously do the following: · The card row should be adjusted as follows: · End of Round V	p.17	#5	0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	vector + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it
#4	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Solo Variant · Setup · Rival Setup · Rival Action Stack · Gameplay · Rival Actions	p.20	#13	0.013699 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#5	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	ORNATE HAMMER · OBSIDIAN EARRING · PATHFINDER'S SANDALS PATHFINDER'S STAFF	p.22	#23	0.012048 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#6	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Don't Forget!	p.23	#10	0.014286 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#7	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Dig at a Site · THE DECISION ARROW	p.20	#7	0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	vector + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it
#8	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Buy an Artifact · End of Round · Scoring · Solo Campaign The Search for Professor Kutil	p.21	#2	0.047875 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it

chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited

#	document	heading	page	quote chars
[1]	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Final Scoring · Whoever has the most points wins.	p.18	no quote on the wire
[2]	RULEBOOK Lost Ruins of Arnak — Rulebook (corpus doc 212)	Buy an Artifact · End of Round · Scoring · Solo Campaign The Search for Professor Kutil	p.21	no quote on the wire

generation — timing and the path taken

timing split: retrieval 81 ms · first delta 2750 ms · total 4749 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
full breakdown: queued 0 ms · retrieval 81 ms · ask 4667 ms · gateway work 4749 ms · total 4749 ms
tokens in (the prompt the answerer read): 3354
tokens out (what the answerer generated): 275
tok/sec: 141.0 tok/sec — 275 output tokens in 1.951 s of generation
live seat (read from the running child): answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 28s ago)
stream path: streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
watchdog: first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
num_ctx · think posture: both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.

disposition

outcome: ANSWERED — Answered
abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered): answered — no abstain rationale applies

setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render

decision: NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question

errata registry — what the gate above had to match against

this game registers NO errata cards (edition 137), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one

Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.