Ruling — Acquire

You asked

I can’t find the dice

Abstained — no grounded answer; closest passages below counted as honest abstain

Asked with: Acquirebg-5-en-1e

I looked through Acquire's rulebook and couldn't find a solid answer to that one — and I'd rather tell you so than guess at your table. Try asking it another way, or ask me about setup, turns, or how the game ends: those I know cold. If you're thinking of the playing pieces, this game has banners, bills, Building Tiles, building tiles, Gameboard, gameboard, Headquarters Banners, Headquarters Buildings, headquarters buildings, Money Pack, Player Aid Card, Stock Cards, and Stockholder Info Cards — ask me about those and I've got you.

The closest rulebook passages are below — check them before ruling.

RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook · p.16 · PLAYING A TWO-PLAYER GAME

When playing a two-player game, follow the rules for the core game using the Classic Mode side of the Stockholder Info Card, but follow the rules below when mergers occur: When determining stockholder bonuses, consider the stock market as an additional stockholder with a random number of shares. To

RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook · p.4 · THE FIRST TIME YOU PLAY

Remove all game components from the shrink-wrap, and discard the waste. Remove the headquarters banners from the runner. Insert the banners into the headquarters buildings as shown to the right, matching the numbers on the runner to the numbered image shown.

RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook · p.14 · Incorrect Building Tile Placement

If a tile is placed in the wrong spot on the board and discovered on the turn it was placed, then it's moved to the correct location. When an incorrect placement is discovered from a prior turn, that tile will remain in its current location. If the correct tile is held by a player, then exchange it

RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook · p.13 · A STANDARD MERGER

To determine stockholder bonuses, the players now count how many stocks they each own in Imperial. Liz owns three, Charlie owns two, and Courtney owns none. Because Liz has the most stocks, she gets the primary stockholder bonus. Charlie has the second-most, so he gets the secondary bonus. Courtney

RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook · p.10 · RUNNING OUT OF MONEY

It is possible to run out of money. If you run out of money, you may still place and draw building tiles each turn, but you may not purchase stock. You must wait until you receive a stockholder bonus or sell stocks in a hotel chain that has been acquired to get money. You can't sell stocks in an act

🔧 debug — where this ruling came from

outcome

ABSTAINED — Abstained — no grounded answer; closest passages below

warm abstain

this ruling — W2 — negative component (degraded: no absence proof) · receipt: ask names the component term "dice" · components: this edition's approved setup checklist (13 names, via ComponentsService — the servable SETUP steps, not an inventory of the box) · guard: "dice" appears in none of the 8 retrieved passages — heading, and the ≤300-char excerpt, which is NOT the whole chunk · absence: NOT checked and NOT claimed — no corpus text is reachable at render

corpus profile

live,vps

answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)

gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70

timings

search 65 ms · ask 1938 ms · total 2004 ms

single-flight (PR-5)

queued 0 ms · generation 2004 ms

retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read

[{"page": 16, "score": 0.032787, "snippet": "When playing a two-player game, follow the rules for the core game using the Classic Mode side of the Stockholder Info Card, but follow the rules below when mergers occur: When determining stockholder bonuses, consider the stock market as an additional stockholder with a random number of shares. To ", "headingPath": "PLAYING A TWO-PLAYER GAME", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 4, "score": 0.032258, "snippet": "Remove all game components from the shrink-wrap, and discard the waste. Remove the headquarters banners from the runner. Insert the banners into the headquarters buildings as shown to the right, matching the numbers on the runner to the numbered image shown.", "headingPath": "THE FIRST TIME YOU PLAY", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 14, "score": 0.031746, "snippet": "If a tile is placed in the wrong spot on the board and discovered on the turn it was placed, then it's moved to the correct location. When an incorrect placement is discovered from a prior turn, that tile will remain in its current location. If the correct tile is held by a player, then exchange it ", "headingPath": "Incorrect Building Tile Placement", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 13, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "To determine stockholder bonuses, the players now count how many stocks they each own in Imperial. Liz owns three, Charlie owns two, and Courtney owns none. Because Liz has the most stocks, she gets the primary stockholder bonus. Charlie has the second-most, so he gets the secondary bonus. Courtney ", "headingPath": "A STANDARD MERGER", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 10, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "It is possible to run out of money. If you run out of money, you may still place and draw building tiles each turn, but you may not purchase stock. You must wait until you receive a stockholder bonus or sell stocks in a hotel chain that has been acquired to get money. You can't sell stocks in an act", "headingPath": "RUNNING OUT OF MONEY", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 12, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "For the examples on the next page, imagine that Festival and Imperial have merged. Festival was the larger hotel chain because it had seven tiles and Imperial had only five, so Imperial has been acquired and its tiles become part of Festival.", "headingPath": "Here are some examples of how to determine who gets what bonus.", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 13, "score": 0.029851, "snippet": "Imagine Liz owns three stocks in Imperial, Charlie owns two, and Courtney owns two. Because Imperial had five tiles, the primary bonus is 7000, and Liz gets that. The secondary bonus is 5000 and the tertiary bonus is 3500. Because they were tied for second, Charlie and Courtney add the secondary and", "headingPath": "A TIE FOR SECONDARY STOCKHOLDER", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}, {"page": 15, "score": 0.029412, "snippet": "Game Designer: Sid Sackson Senior Producer of Board & Card Games: Dan Bojanowski Director of Visual Design: Anita Osburn Illustrator: Eric Hibbeler Graphic Designer: Anita Osburn Editor: William Niebling Production Artist: Noelle Lopez 3D Artist: David L'Huillier Expert Consultants: Thomas Haver & J", "headingPath": "CREDITS", "sharpsignalDocId": 93}]

citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show

[]

boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)

no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 93 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true

base rulebook doc 93 boosted

answered-before recall

no past answered ruling for this game matched closely enough

similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)

debug row retained until

Nov 12, 2026 15:52

retrieval — what the passage search returned

what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.

score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.

per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

fused rank	document	heading	page	fused RRF score	snippet chars
#1	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	PLAYING A TWO-PLAYER GAME	p.16	0.032787 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#2	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	THE FIRST TIME YOU PLAY	p.4	0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	258
#3	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	Incorrect Building Tile Placement	p.14	0.031746 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#4	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	A STANDARD MERGER	p.13	0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#5	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	RUNNING OUT OF MONEY	p.10	0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#6	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	Here are some examples of how to determine who gets what bonus.	p.12	0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	242
#7	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	A TIE FOR SECONDARY STOCKHOLDER	p.13	0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#8	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	CREDITS	p.15	0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300

what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it

what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.

candidate pool: the answering read scored 48 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.

floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.

arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.

read at	document	heading	page	fused rank	fused RRF score	carried by	how it got its slot
#1	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	RUNNING OUT OF MONEY	p.10	#5	0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	vector + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it
#2	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)		p.1	#44	0.009615 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#3	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	YOU MERGE TWO OR MORE HOTEL CHAINS TOGETHER	p.8	#43	0.009709 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#4	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	YOU FOUND A HOTEL CHAIN	p.6	#32	0.01087 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#5	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	PLAYING A TWO-PLAYER GAME	p.16	#1	0.032787 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	vector + the doc-priority boost arm	the re-ranker chose it
#6	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	SETUP	p.4	#19	0.012658 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#7	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	A TIE	p.11	#14	0.013514 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it
#8	RULEBOOK Acquire — Rulebook (corpus doc 93)	3. Draw a Building Tile	p.10	#9	0.014493 (below 0.016, the low end of the measured band — a weak fuse (that band was taken on two-arm asks; only its low end, one arm's #1 vote, carries over to a 3-arm one))	vector	the re-ranker chose it

chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited

#	document	heading	page	quote chars

generation — timing and the path taken

timing split: retrieval 65 ms · first delta 1908 ms · total 2004 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
full breakdown: queued 0 ms · retrieval 65 ms · ask 1938 ms · gateway work 2004 ms · total 2004 ms
tokens in (the prompt the answerer read): 1767
tokens out (what the answerer generated): 9
tok/sec: 138.5 tok/sec — 9 output tokens in 0.065 s of generation
live seat (read from the running child): answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 10s ago)
stream path: streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
watchdog: first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
num_ctx · think posture: both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.

disposition

outcome: ABSTAINED — Abstained — no grounded answer; closest passages below
abstain rationale: I don't have enough information.
the answerer's own words, verbatim — hostile corpus/LLM text, rendered escaped

setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render

decision: NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question

errata registry — what the gate above had to match against

this game registers NO errata cards (edition 24), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one

Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.