You asked
How do I play?
Answered counted as answeredAsked with: Challengers!bg-359970-en-1e
Rule found, game on.
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- corpus profile
- live,vps
- answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
- gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
- timings
- search 82 ms · ask 9716 ms · total 9800 ms
- single-flight (PR-5)
- queued 0 ms · generation 9800 ms
- retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read
- [{"page": 3, "score": 0.04918, "snippet": "If you play with an odd number of players, the Robot substitutes for a missing player. Place a Tournament Plan that corresponds to your player count next to the park half indicated in the first line of the Tournament Plan. If all players agree, it is recommended to use the Tournament Plan that only ", "headingPath": "the robot · 2-player game", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.047883, "snippet": "Card's base power + power bonuses As soon as the total power of your card(s) is equal to or higher than the total power of the card of your opponent, take the flag and place it on your latest revealed card. You must not reveal more cards than needed to get in flag possession. Your latest revealed ca", "headingPath": "Total power of the card = · There are 2 ways to win: · final & game end", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.047875, "snippet": "1 Take the parks according to your player count and place them on the table. Give a Tournament Plan to each player according to the number of players. Then, each player sits at the park half which icon and background color is depicted in the first line of their Tournament Plan. 2 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 2 3", "headingPath": "setup · deck phase · Move to another park if necessary. A · Overview of a Tournament Plan:", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.047123, "snippet": "Draw 5 cards from the available Level Pile of the current round. The letter A, B or C shows the available Level Pile. The amount of card icons shows how many cards you can pick and add to your deck. Pick 2 cards from LevelA-Pile. Discard the cards you did not pick in the discard compartment of the c", "headingPath": "Draw and pick cards. B · Remove cards from your deck (optional). c · match phase · Total power of the cards =", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.046154, "snippet": "7 7 AUTOCORRECT You play alone against the Robot. The rules of the 2-Player game apply, as described above. In contrast to the multiplayer game, the Robot collects the Trophies it has won and can also win the game immediately if it has at least 11 fans more than you. Follow the Setup with Robot as d", "headingPath": "solo mode", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 1, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "A GAME BY JOHANNES KRENNER & MARKUS SLAWITSCHECK Will your dream team succeed? Helped by your Bard, your Kraken just captured the flag! You're now waiting for your opponent's attack ready to fight back with your Necromancer and your Rubber Duck! From outer space aliens to deep-sea creatures, improba", "headingPath": "RULEBOOK · CONTENTS", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.029851, "snippet": "Designers: Johannes Krenner & Markus Slawitscheck Producer: Sophie Gravel Game Editors: Martin Bouchard, Roman Rybiczka & Julian Steindorfer Illustrator: Jeff Harvey Graphic Design: Bree Lindsoe & Martin Roy Consultant Cultural Sensitivity: Calvin Wong Tze Loon Follow us on: /1moretimegames /planbga", "headingPath": "CREDITS", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.029412, "snippet": "When you reveal a card without keywords, you must immediately resolve the effect of the card as much as possible. Important: If a card gets an immediate power bonus, that card keeps it even in flag possession. When you reveal a card with bold keywords, these indicate when their effect applies or wil", "headingPath": "effects", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}]
- citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show
- [{"page": 2, "quote": null, "headingPath": "setup · deck phase · Move to another park if necessary. A · Overview of a Tournament Plan:", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 2, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Draw and pick cards. B · Remove cards from your deck (optional). c · match phase · Total power of the cards =", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}, {"page": 2, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Total power of the card = · There are 2 ways to win: · final & game end", "sharpsignalDocId": 807}]
- boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
-
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 807 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 807 boosted
- answered-before recall
-
this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
- answer fence
- passed — letter density 0.89956 of 3186 non-space chars (floor 0.45); 0 glyph-index tokens (max 2)
- debug row retained until
- Nov 23, 2026 16:16 UTC
retrieval — what the passage search returned
what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.
score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.
per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| fused rank | document | heading | page | fused RRF score | snippet chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | the robot · 2-player game | p.3 | 0.04918 (at the 3-arm ceiling (0.04918) — every arm ranked it #1) | 300 |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | Total power of the card = · There are 2 ways to win: · final & game end | p.2 | 0.047883 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | setup · deck phase · Move to another park if necessary. A · Overview of a Tournament Plan: | p.2 | 0.047875 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | Draw and pick cards. B · Remove cards from your deck (optional). c · match phase · Total power of the cards = | p.2 | 0.047123 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | solo mode | p.3 | 0.046154 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | RULEBOOK · CONTENTS | p.1 | 0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | CREDITS | p.3 | 0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | effects | p.3 | 0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it
what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.
candidate pool: the answering read scored 8 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.
floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.
arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.
| read at | document | heading | page | fused rank | fused RRF score | carried by | how it got its slot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | the robot · 2-player game | p.3 | #1 | 0.04918 (at the 3-arm ceiling (0.04918) — every arm ranked it #1) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | solo mode | p.3 | #5 | 0.046154 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | Draw and pick cards. B · Remove cards from your deck (optional). c · match phase · Total power of the cards = | p.2 | #4 | 0.047123 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | effects | p.3 | #8 | 0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | CREDITS | p.3 | #7 | 0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | RULEBOOK · CONTENTS | p.1 | #6 | 0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | Total power of the card = · There are 2 ways to win: · final & game end | p.2 | #2 | 0.047883 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | setup · deck phase · Move to another park if necessary. A · Overview of a Tournament Plan: | p.2 | #3 | 0.047875 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| # | document | heading | page | quote chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | setup · deck phase · Move to another park if necessary. A · Overview of a Tournament Plan: | p.2 | no quote on the wire |
| [2] | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | Draw and pick cards. B · Remove cards from your deck (optional). c · match phase · Total power of the cards = | p.2 | no quote on the wire |
| [3] | RULEBOOK Challengers! — Rulebook (corpus doc 807) | Total power of the card = · There are 2 ways to win: · final & game end | p.2 | no quote on the wire |
generation — timing and the path taken
- timing split
- retrieval 82 ms · first delta 1988 ms · total 9800 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
- full breakdown
- queued 0 ms · retrieval 82 ms · ask 9716 ms · gateway work 9800 ms · total 9800 ms
- tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
- 3211
- tokens out (what the answerer generated)
- 1024
- tok/sec
- 132.3 tok/sec — 1024 output tokens in 7.739 s of generation
- live seat (read from the running child)
- answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 31s ago)
- gateway schema (read from the running child)
- schema head 0042_definer_search_path (live revision not readable by this principal)
- answerer host (measured by rulesage)
- reachable (for 60h, checked 9s ago)
- answerer node (the seat proxy's own header — this probe, not this ask)
- node1
- stream path
- streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
- watchdog
- first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
- num_ctx · think posture
- both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
disposition
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered)
- answered — no abstain rationale applies
setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render
- decision
- NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question
errata registry — what the gate above had to match against
this game registers NO errata cards (edition 742), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one
Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.